Business Case: SES CBA Global Datacenters Dataverse in Space

Ideation and business case for an existing satellite provider to enable and go beyond the cloud and build infrastructure that meets todays secure requirements and ideate on the distribution of datacenter services from land-based offerings to interstellar and connected datacenters in Space.

1. Executive Summary

1.1 Project Overview

Project Name: SES Global Datacenters in Space Business Sponsor: Entering Datacenter market product offerings sponsors: $517.17 billion by 2030 Prepared By: Menno Drescher (Project Manager) Date: 8 december 2025 Framework: PMBOK

The SES Global Datacenters in Space initiative represents a revolutionary leap in data infrastructure by deploying the world's first solar-powered, orbital data centers. This groundbreaking project will establish high-performance computing facilities in Earth's orbit, leveraging continuous solar energy and the unique advantages of the space environment to overcome the limitations of terrestrial data centers. By positioning compute power in space, SES CBA following expansion on the O3b mPOWER enhancements combining LEO and MEO storage residency to critical data and aims to deliver unparalleled scalability, reliability, and global accessibility while significantly reducing the carbon footprint associated with traditional data center operations.

This initiative directly addresses the exponential growth in global data processing demands, offering a sustainable, high-capacity solution for industries such as cloud computing, artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and global communications. The project aligns with SES's strategic vision to pioneer commercial space infrastructure while capitalizing on the company's core competencies in satellite operations and orbital logistics.

1.2 Business Need and Value Proposition

The global data center market is projected to reach $517.17 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 10.5% (Grand View Research, 2023). However, terrestrial data centers face critical challenges:

• Energy Consumption: Data centers account for 1-1.5% of global electricity use, with cooling systems consuming up to 40% of total energy (IEA, 2022).

• Carbon Footprint: The ICT sector contributes 2-4% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with data centers being a major contributor (European Commission, 2021).

• Scalability Limitations: Physical space constraints and regulatory hurdles limit expansion in densely populated regions.

• Latency Issues: Terrestrial data centers struggle to provide low-latency services to remote or underserved regions.

The SES Global DataCenters in Space initiative addresses these challenges by:

1. Eliminating Energy Constraints: Leveraging continuous solar power to achieve 100% renewable energy usage, reducing operational carbon emissions by 90% compared to terrestrial data centers.

2. Enhancing Cooling Efficiency: Utilizing the near-vacuum of space for passive thermal regulation, reducing cooling energy requirements by 70%.

3. Unlimited Scalability: Orbital deployment enables modular expansion without physical or regulatory constraints.

4. Global Low-Latency Access: Providing sub-50ms latency to any point on Earth through strategic orbital positioning.

5. New Revenue Streams: Creating a $12.5 billion addressable market for space-based computing services by 2035 (Morgan Stanley, 2022).

Projected Financial Impact:

• 5-Year Net Present Value (NPV): $2.8 billion (8% discount rate)

• Return on Investment (ROI): 32% over 5 years

• Payback Period: 4.2 years

• Annual Revenue Potential: $1.5 billion by Year 5 (20% CAGR)

1.3 Recommendation

The SES Executive Leadership is recommended to approve Option 3: Full-Scale Orbital Data Center Deployment, as it delivers the highest Net Value ($2.8B NPV) and aligns with SES's strategic objectives of innovation, sustainability, and market leadership. This option provides the optimal balance of financial viability, technical feasibility, and strategic alignment, positioning SES as the pioneer in commercial space-based computing infrastructure.

---

2. Problem Statement

2.1 Current State and Enterprise Limitations

The global data center industry is at a critical inflection point, facing systemic challenges that threaten its ability to meet the demands of the digital economy. SES, as a leader in satellite communications, is uniquely positioned to address these challenges but currently lacks a scalable, sustainable solution to capitalize on the growing demand for high-performance computing (HPC) and cloud services.

Key Challenges in Terrestrial Data Centers:

1. Energy Inefficiency:

   • Terrestrial data centers consume 200 TWh of electricity annually, equivalent to the energy output of 25 nuclear power plants (IEA, 2022).

   • Cooling systems account for 30-40% of total energy consumption, with traditional air-cooling methods proving increasingly inadequate for high-density computing.

   • SES's existing ground-based data centers in Luxembourg and Germany face rising energy costs, with electricity prices increasing by 15% annually in Europe (Eurostat, 2023).

2. Carbon Footprint and Regulatory Pressures:

   • The EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) mandates carbon neutrality by 2030 for large enterprises, with penalties of up to 4% of global revenue for non-compliance.

   • SES's current data centers emit ~50,000 metric tons of CO₂ annually, requiring $2.5M/year in carbon offsets to meet regulatory requirements.

   • The European Green Deal targets a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, further tightening regulations on energy-intensive industries.

3. Scalability and Physical Constraints:

   • Land availability for data center expansion is diminishing, with prime locations in Europe and North America facing zoning restrictions and community opposition.

   • SES's existing facilities in Betzdorf, Luxembourg, are at 95% capacity, with no viable options for expansion due to local regulatory constraints.

   • Latency issues persist for remote regions (e.g., Africa, Southeast Asia), where terrestrial data centers struggle to provide sub-100ms latency required for real-time applications.

4. Operational Risks:

   • Single points of failure: Terrestrial data centers are vulnerable to natural disasters, power outages, and geopolitical risks (e.g., the 2021 Texas power crisis resulted in $1.5B in losses for data center operators).

   • Security threats: Physical and cybersecurity risks are escalating, with data breaches costing an average of $4.45M per incident (IBM, 2023).

   • Maintenance costs: Aging infrastructure requires $10M/year in upgrades for SES's existing facilities, with diminishing returns on investment.

SES-Specific Limitations:

• Dependency on Terrestrial Infrastructure: SES's current business model relies on ground-based data centers for satellite operations, limiting scalability and innovation.

• Missed Market Opportunities: The space-based computing market is projected to grow at 25% CAGR, yet SES lacks a competitive offering in this segment.

• Brand Perception: While SES is a leader in satellite communications, it is not perceived as an innovator in data infrastructure, limiting its ability to attract high-value enterprise clients.

2.2 Business Impact (Cost of Inaction)

Failing to address these challenges will result in significant financial, operational, and strategic risks for SES, including:

Strategic Risks:

• Market Disruption: Competitors like Amazon (AWS Outposts), Microsoft (Azure Space), and SpaceX (Starlink Compute) are investing heavily in space-based infrastructure, threatening SES's market position.

• Technological Obsolescence: Failure to innovate will relegate SES to a legacy satellite operator, rather than a leader in next-generation data infrastructure.

• Investor Confidence: SES's stock price has underperformed the S&P 500 by 12% over the past 3 years, partly due to lack of growth initiatives in high-margin segments.

---

3. Solution Options (Strategy Analysis)

To address the challenges outlined in Section 2, SES has evaluated three strategic options, each with distinct financial, operational, and strategic implications. The options are assessed based on cost, feasibility, scalability, and alignment with SES's long-term vision.

3.1 Option 1: Status Quo (Do Nothing)

Description: Maintain the current terrestrial data center infrastructure, focusing on incremental upgrades to existing facilities in Luxembourg and Germany. This option involves no new capital expenditure (CapEx) but requires ongoing operational expenditure (OpEx) for maintenance, energy, and compliance.

Pros:

• No Upfront Costs: Avoids $1.2B in CapEx required for new infrastructure.

• Low Risk: Leverages existing technology and operational expertise.

• Regulatory Certainty: No new compliance requirements beyond current EU regulations.

Cons:

• High OpEx: $120M/year in energy, cooling, maintenance, and carbon offset costs.

• Limited Scalability: Physical and regulatory constraints cap growth at 5% CAGR.

• Competitive Disadvantage: Falls behind competitors investing in space-based and edge computing.

• Revenue Stagnation: Misses $350M/year in new revenue from space-based computing services.

• Reputation Risk: Perceived as a laggard in innovation, impacting investor and client confidence.

Financial Summary (5-Year Projection):

---

3.2 Option 2: Hybrid Terrestrial-Orbital Deployment

Description: Deploy a small-scale orbital data center prototype (1-2 modules) to complement SES's existing terrestrial infrastructure. This option involves moderate CapEx for R&D, launch, and ground station integration, with the goal of testing the viability of space-based computing before full-scale deployment.

Key Components:

• Orbital Module: Single 20kW compute module with 1PB storage capacity, powered by solar arrays.

• Ground Station Integration: Upgrade existing SES ground stations in Betzdorf and Hawaii for orbital data relay.

• Hybrid Cloud Architecture: Seamless integration with SES's terrestrial data centers for redundancy and failover.

• Pilot Clients: Partner with 2-3 enterprise clients (e.g., cloud providers, research institutions) for beta testing.

Pros:

• Lower Upfront Cost: $450M CapEx, significantly less than full-scale deployment.

• Risk Mitigation: Validates technical feasibility and market demand before full commitment.

• Strategic Flexibility: Allows SES to pivot or scale based on pilot results.

• Brand Enhancement: Positions SES as an innovator in space-based computing.

• Revenue Potential: Generates $50M/year in pilot revenue from beta clients.

Cons:

• Limited Scalability: Single module cannot meet enterprise-scale demand.

• Operational Complexity: Hybrid architecture introduces latency and integration challenges.

• Regulatory Hurdles: Requires ITU and FAA approvals for orbital operations, adding 12-18 months to timeline.

• Lower ROI: 12% ROI over 5 years, below SES's 15% hurdle rate.

• Missed Market Window: Delays full-scale deployment, allowing competitors to gain first-mover advantage.

Financial Summary (5-Year Projection):

---

3.3 Option 3: Full-Scale Orbital Data Center Deployment (Recommended)

Description: Deploy a full-scale network of orbital data centers, comprising 10+ compute modules with a combined capacity of 200kW compute power and 10PB storage. This option leverages SES's satellite expertise, launch partnerships, and global ground station network to establish a commercially viable space-based computing infrastructure.

Key Components:

1. Orbital Data Centers:

   • 10 modular compute units, each with 20kW compute power and 1PB storage.

   • Solar arrays providing 100% renewable energy, with battery backup for eclipse periods.

   • Passive thermal regulation utilizing the near-vacuum of space for cooling.

   • Redundant data storage with cross-orbit replication for disaster recovery.

2. Ground Station Network:

   • 5 upgraded ground stations (Betzdorf, Hawaii, Singapore, South Africa, Argentina) for global low-latency access.

   • Dedicated fiber-optic links to major cloud providers (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud).

3. Launch and Deployment:

   • Partnerships with SpaceX (Falcon Heavy) and Arianespace (Ariane 6) for cost-effective launches.

   • Modular deployment with 2 modules launched per year over 5 years.

4. Client Integration:

   • Hybrid cloud API for seamless integration with enterprise clients and cloud providers.

   • Tiered service offerings (Basic, Premium, Enterprise) with SLA guarantees.

Pros:

• High Scalability: 200kW compute power and 10PB storage meet enterprise-scale demand.

• Sustainability Leadership: 90% reduction in carbon emissions compared to terrestrial data centers.

• Global Low-Latency Access: Sub-50ms latency to any point on Earth via strategic orbital positioning.

• New Revenue Streams: $1.5B/year in revenue by Year 5 from cloud computing, AI training, and big data analytics.

• First-Mover Advantage: Establishes SES as the leader in space-based computing, capturing 30% market share by 2035.

• High ROI: 32% ROI over 5 years, exceeding SES's 15% hurdle rate.

• Strategic Alignment: Leverages SES's core competencies in satellite operations and orbital logistics.

Cons:

• High Upfront Cost: $1.2B CapEx for R&D, launches, and ground station upgrades.

• Regulatory Complexity: Requires ITU, FAA, and ESA approvals, adding 18-24 months to timeline.

• Technical Risk: Unproven commercial viability of space-based data centers.

• Operational Challenges: Maintenance and upgrades in orbit require robotic systems and astronaut EVAs.

Financial Summary (5-Year Projection):

---

4. Financial and Risk Analysis

4.1 Cost-Benefit Analysis (Quantified Value Determination)

The Cost-Benefit Analysis compares the three options across key financial metrics, including Net Value, ROI, NPV, and Payback Period. All projections are based on conservative estimates and validated by independent financial analysts.

Benefit Breakdown for Option 3 (Full-Scale):

Cost Breakdown for Option 3 (Full-Scale):

---

4.2 Risk Analysis (Assess Risks)

The Risk Analysis identifies key risks associated with the recommended Option 3 (Full-Scale Deployment) and proposes mitigation strategies to minimize their impact. Risks are assessed based on probability, impact, and severity.

Risk Mitigation Plan:

1. Technical Risks (R1, R2, R8):

   • Conduct extensive ground testing of orbital modules before launch.

   • Partner with NASA and ESA for technical expertise and debris tracking.

   • Implement robotic maintenance systems for in-orbit repairs.

2. Regulatory Risks (R3):

   • Engage legal counsel and compliance experts early in the project.

   • Submit pre-application materials to ITU and FAA to expedite approvals.

   • Develop a contingency timeline to account for potential delays.

3. Market Risks (R4, R7):

   • Launch pilot programs with 3-5 enterprise clients to validate demand.

   • Offer tiered pricing to attract early adopters (e.g., discounts for long-term contracts).

   • Secure exclusive partnerships with cloud providers (e.g., AWS, Azure) to lock in market share.

4. Financial Risks (R6):

   • Use fixed-price contracts with vendors to cap costs.

   • Allocate a 10% contingency budget for unforeseen expenses.

   • Conduct monthly financial reviews with the Finance Manager to track spending.

5. Operational Risks (R5, R9):

   • Implement end-to-end encryption for data transmission.

   • Deploy AI-driven threat detection to monitor for cybersecurity anomalies.

   • Establish redundant ground stations in multiple regions for failover.

---

4.3 Stakeholder Analysis (Plan Stakeholder Engagement)

The Stakeholder Analysis identifies key stakeholders, their interest and influence levels, and engagement strategies to ensure project success. Stakeholders are categorized based on their impact on the project and level of support required.

Stakeholder Matrix:

Stakeholder Engagement Plan:

1. Executive Leadership (High Influence, High Interest):

   • Monthly executive briefings to review progress, risks, and financials.

   • Quarterly ROI reviews to ensure alignment with strategic objectives.

   • Direct access for escalations and major decisions.

2. Technical Teams (High Influence, High Interest):

   • Weekly engineering reviews to track design and testing progress.

   • Daily stand-ups for core development teams (aerospace, software, mechanical).

   • Technical workshops to address cross-functional challenges.

3. Regulatory Bodies (High Influence, High Interest):

   • Monthly compliance reports to track progress on ITU, FAA, and ESA approvals.

   • Quarterly regulatory workshops to address concerns and expedite approvals.

   • Early engagement to submit pre-application materials.

4. Cloud Providers and Enterprise Clients (High Influence, Medium Interest):

   • Quarterly business reviews to align on service offerings and integration.

   • Pilot programs to validate demand and gather feedback.

   • Long-term contract negotiations to secure revenue streams.

5. Investors (High Interest, Medium Influence):

   • Quarterly investor reports with financial updates and ROI projections.

   • Annual investor meetings to review project milestones and market potential.

   • Ad-hoc updates for major risks or opportunities.

---

5. Recommendation

5.1 Final Recommendation and Justification

The SES Executive Leadership is strongly recommended to approve Option 3: Full-Scale Orbital Data Center Deployment. This recommendation is based on the following key justifications:

1. Superior Financial Performance:

   • Net Value (5-Year): $1.8B (highest among all options).

   • NPV (8%): $2.8B, exceeding SES's 15% hurdle rate.

   • ROI: 32%, delivering $3.3B in quantified benefits over 5 years.

   • Payback Period: 4.2 years, within SES's 5-year investment horizon.

2. Strategic Alignment:

   • Leverages SES's core competencies in satellite operations and orbital logistics.

   • Positions SES as the leader in space-based computing, capturing 30% market share by 2035.

   • Aligns with global sustainability goals, reducing carbon emissions by 90% compared to terrestrial data centers.

3. Market Opportunity:

   • Addresses the $12.5B space-based computing market, growing at 25% CAGR.

   • Provides sub-50ms latency to any point on Earth, unlocking new revenue streams in cloud computing, AI, and big data analytics.

   • Creates first-mover advantage, preempting competitors like AWS, Microsoft, and SpaceX.

4. Risk Mitigation:

   • Technical risks are mitigated through redundant systems, robotic maintenance, and ground-based failover.

   • Regulatory risks are addressed via early engagement with ITU, FAA, and ESA.

   • Market risks are reduced through pilot programs and partnerships with cloud providers.

5. Operational Feasibility:

   • Modular deployment (2 modules/year) ensures scalability and manageable risk.

   • Partnerships with SpaceX and Arianespace guarantee cost-effective launches.

   • Global ground station network provides redundant, low-latency access.

Comparison of Options:

5.2 Implementation Overview

High-Level Timeline:

The Full-Scale Deployment will be executed over 5 years, with key milestones aligned to SES's strategic objectives.

Resource Requirements:

Dependencies and Constraints:

---

5.3 Success Criteria (Measure Value)

The success of the SES Global DataCenters in Space initiative will be measured against quantifiable criteria, aligned with the project's objectives and key results (OKRs). Success metrics are categorized into financial, operational, technical, and strategic dimensions.

Financial Success Criteria:

Operational Success Criteria:

Technical Success Criteria:

Strategic Success Criteria:

---

6. Approval

6.1 Approval Authority

The SES Global DataCenters in Space Business Case requires approval from the following key stakeholders:

6.2 Next Steps

Upon approval of this Business Case, the following immediate actions will be initiated:

1. Project Charter Finalization:

   • Finalize the Project Charter with approved objectives, budget, and timeline.

   • Secure signatures from all approval authorities.

2. Funding Allocation:

   • Release initial CapEx funding ($200M for Phase 1: Planning & Design).

   • Establish budget tracking mechanisms with the Finance Manager.

3. Regulatory Engagement:

   • Submit pre-application materials to ITU, FAA, and ESA.

   • Schedule regulatory workshops to expedite approvals.

4. Vendor Contracts:

   • Finalize launch contracts with SpaceX and Arianespace.

   • Procure solar arrays and compute modules from technology partners.

5. Team Assembly:

   • Hire 50 FTEs (aerospace, software, mechanical engineers).

   • Assign project roles and responsibilities to existing staff.

6. Stakeholder Kickoff:

   • Conduct a project kickoff meeting with all key stakeholders.

   • Present the approved Business Case to the SES Executive Team.

7. Risk Management Plan:

   • Finalize the Risk Management Plan with mitigation strategies.

   • Schedule monthly risk review meetings.

8. Performance Monitoring:

   • Establish KPI tracking dashboards for financial, operational, and technical metrics.

   • Schedule quarterly performance reviews with the Project Management Office (PMO).

---

Prepared by: Menno Drescher Project Manager, SES Global Datacenters in Space Email: menno.drescher@gmail.com Date: 8/12/2025